feat: add visits and shiny usage to metrics api #387
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
☂️ Python Coverage
Overall Coverage
New FilesNo new covered files... Modified Files
|
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A start of a change to expose each of the two current metrics endpoints independently. It needs tests and documentation.
However this isn't intended to and likely will not land: What's the use case for comparing them separately? It's a pain to manually coalesce them when analyzing user traffic, which is why I decided on the approach on main. Here's a summary of the differences I observed. https://docs.posit.co/connect/cookbook/metrics/viewing-content-usage-information/#discussion