Skip to content

Error create extention rum #1

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
andreak opened this issue May 29, 2016 · 10 comments
Closed

Error create extention rum #1

andreak opened this issue May 29, 2016 · 10 comments

Comments

@andreak
Copy link

andreak commented May 29, 2016

andreak=# create extension rum ;
ERROR:  operator <-> already exists

andreak=# select version();
                                                   version                                                   
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 PostgreSQL 9.6beta1 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Ubuntu 5.3.1-14ubuntu2) 5.3.1 20160413, 64-bit

@za-arthur
Copy link
Contributor

Hello. What extensions did you installed, except rum?
You can see list of the installed extensions by using \dx command on psql.

@andreak
Copy link
Author

andreak commented May 29, 2016

andreak=# \dx
                                     List of installed extensions
    Name    | Version |   Schema   |                            Description                            
------------+---------+------------+-------------------------------------------------------------------
 btree_gin  | 1.0     | public     | support for indexing common datatypes in GIN
 btree_gist | 1.1     | public     | support for indexing common datatypes in GiST
 pg_trgm    | 1.2     | public     | text similarity measurement and index searching based on trigrams
 plpgsql    | 1.0     | pg_catalog | PL/pgSQL procedural language
(4 rows)

@obartunov
Copy link

On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

andreak=# \dx
List of installed extensions
Name | Version | Schema | Description
------------+---------+------------+-------------------------------------------------------------------
btree_gin | 1.0 | public | support for indexing common datatypes in GIN
btree_gist | 1.1 | public | support for indexing common datatypes in GiST

bum, btree_gist !

pg_trgm | 1.2 | public | text similarity measurement and index searching based on trigrams
plpgsql | 1.0 | pg_catalog | PL/pgSQL procedural language
(4 rows)


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#1 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AGFI4omqkBnbbt035RtoEuNPRksRGDkKks5qGeTJgaJpZM4IpQGj
.

@akorotkov
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, it appears that btree_gist also contains "timestamp <-> timestamp".

@andreak
Copy link
Author

andreak commented May 30, 2016

Will this be fixed so that it doesn't clash with btree_gist? I depend upon btree_gist for exclusion-constraints so I really cannot remove it.

@obartunov
Copy link

On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

Will this be fixed so that it doesn't clash with btree_gist? I depend upon
btree_gist for exclusion-constraints so I really cannot remove it.

yes, it should be fixed.


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#1 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AGFI4oFmKKLEbwfnGkeOAJPBbI54QIxmks5qGylVgaJpZM4IpQGj
.

@andreak
Copy link
Author

andreak commented May 30, 2016

Supercool!

@za-arthur
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for the issue! Operator <-> was renamed to <=>.

@andreak
Copy link
Author

andreak commented Aug 2, 2016

Tested it, and it works great now, thanks!

@golgote
Copy link

golgote commented Sep 15, 2021

FYI, <=> now is incompatible with smlar extension...

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants