-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 120
Use beta consistent with literature #379
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you have got all the cases.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm, the proposed changes here contradict what we do in the OpenFOAM adapter paper. There, we use 1.3 and even refer to the tutorials
We select α = 3 and β = 1.3, as used in the preCICE tutorials with other solvers
We selected these parameters due to their value in the tutorial. @MakisH opinions?
I remember discussing this a while ago. I think it was wrong, but kept it to stick with the tutorials. In the OpenFOAM-preCICE paper, we refer to a specific version of the tutorials, so I think we should not be restricted by that. Consistency is more important. |
Closes #378
Comments for the review: Am I missing some tutorial?