-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
🐛 check for None before setting n_jobs
to nb logical CPUs
#126
Conversation
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #126 will degrade performances by 97.95%Comparing Summary
Benchmarks breakdown
|
The tsfel LPCC - bug - for which we provided a hotfix is fixed in https://github.com/fraunhoferportugal/tsfel/releases/tag/v0.1.4 |
Ready for review @jvdd! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
Following the merger of #118 a bug slipped into tsflex.
Parsing the
n_jobs
ignored user-specified values (i.e. integers) and always selected the number of logical cores. As such, it was impossible for users to manage the number of jobs...