Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Migrate ProgressBar to TypeScript #987
Migrate ProgressBar to TypeScript #987
Changes from 2 commits
288465c
f9a7e78
9c3a849
81bfc0c
d41d361
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What do you think about creating an interface at the top of the file for situations like this where it includes multiple lines? My hunch is that for more complex components like this one it can get a little tricky to visually parse. That seems to be what other applications at GH do, might make it easier to read when jumping between codebases. Curious what @smockle or @T-Hugs thinks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I agree. I'd love to come up with a naming convention for this kind of props type that's passed to styled-components but not exported and doesn't contain all the props accepted by the returned component. Maybe
Styled[component-name]Props
(e.g.StyledProgressContainerProps
)?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great idea! Incidentally, organizing prop types this way helped with the namespace components issue described in #999 (comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this necessary if we're setting the default value in defaultProps?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It shouldn't be necessary. But defaultProps + styled-components + TypeScript don't play well together in this case. TypeScript was complaining about
props.barSize
possibly being undefined. I'm open to other solutions :)