fix: add license entries in the 'build' package path #57
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Various sbom tools expect licenseDeclared and licenseConcluded fields to be set. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Chinchani <rchincha@cisco.com>
rchincha
added a commit
to rchincha/stacker
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2024
project-stacker/stacker-bom#57 Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Chinchani <rchincha@cisco.com>
hallyn
pushed a commit
to project-stacker/stacker
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2024
* chore: update stacker-bom dep project-stacker/stacker-bom#57 Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Chinchani <rchincha@cisco.com> * chore: update stacker-bom dep Some sbom verification tools require that the sbom not have empty packages (packages without files) Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Chinchani <rchincha@cisco.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Chinchani <rchincha@cisco.com>
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Various sbom tools expect licenseDeclared and licenseConcluded fields to be set.
What type of PR is this?
Which issue does this PR fix:
What does this PR do / Why do we need it:
If an issue # is not available please add repro steps and logs showing the issue:
Testing done on this change:
Automation added to e2e:
Will this break upgrades or downgrades?
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?:
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.