Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

fix(cloudwatch): NoneType object is not iterable #6676

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

prowler-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Backport

This will backport the following commits from master to v5.1:

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation

@prowler-bot prowler-bot requested review from a team as code owners January 23, 2025 17:27
@prowler-bot prowler-bot added the backport This PR contains a backport label Jan 23, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.05%. Comparing base (f9cfc4d) to head (a67dc28).
Report is 1 commits behind head on v5.1.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             v5.1    #6676      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.07%   90.05%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files        1182     1182              
  Lines       36105    36106       +1     
==========================================
- Hits        32522    32514       -8     
- Misses       3583     3592       +9     
Flag Coverage Δ
prowler 90.05% <100.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
prowler 90.05% <100.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
api ∅ <ø> (∅)

@MrCloudSec MrCloudSec merged commit 6bc68b7 into v5.1 Jan 23, 2025
9 of 10 checks passed
@MrCloudSec MrCloudSec deleted the backport/v5.1/pr-6671 branch January 23, 2025 18:25
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
backport This PR contains a backport
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants