Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

test: Simplify policy unit test #188

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 8, 2019

Conversation

lkollar
Copy link
Contributor

@lkollar lkollar commented Aug 7, 2019

Remove duplicate policies in the unit test to avoid having to make
changes in both the actual implementation and the test as well.

Remove duplicate policies in the unit test to avoid having to make
changes in both the actual implementation and the test as well.
@lkollar lkollar self-assigned this Aug 7, 2019
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 7, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #188 into master will decrease coverage by 0.2%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #188      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   87.64%   87.43%   -0.21%     
==========================================
  Files          19       19              
  Lines         963      963              
  Branches      210      210              
==========================================
- Hits          844      842       -2     
- Misses         83       84       +1     
- Partials       36       37       +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
auditwheel/policy/__init__.py 91.48% <0%> (-4.26%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 94b419b...ae06642. Read the comment docs.

@takluyver takluyver merged commit 7d29c2a into pypa:master Aug 8, 2019
@lkollar lkollar deleted the policy-test-simplify branch July 1, 2021 19:27
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants