Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- http:// → https:// - The Sphinx documentation has changed, update relevant links. - The cited IBM "study" does not seem to be visible online any more. I was merely able to find a short reference here: https://wiki.dirkjanswagerman.nl/index.php?title=11_proven_practices_for_more_effective,_efficient_peer_code_review Instead, point to a Microsoft academic paper. I could find it both on the Microsoft web site: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/characteristics-of-useful-code-reviews-an-empirical-study-at-microsoft/ and in the ACM proceedings: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2820518.2820538 I chose a link to the Microsoft web site, because the PDF of the paper is freely available there: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/bosu2015useful.pdf
- Loading branch information