Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

[3.11] gh-92611: Clarify planned removal version in PEP 594-deprecated modules (GH-92793) #93026

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 20, 2022

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented May 20, 2022

As discussed in GH-92611 and GH-92564 and as a followup to PR GH-92612 , this 3.11+ only PR uses the proper deprecated-removed role for the modules deprecated by PEP 593 (PEP-594) to clearly indicate to users that a removal version is planned and what it is, so they can prepare accordingly or voice any unanticipated impacts.

Related to GH-92792 ; if we decide to backport that PR, the upgrade to using deprecated-removed on those functions can be moved to this one.
(cherry picked from commit 31fa41e)

Co-authored-by: CAM Gerlach CAM.Gerlach@Gerlach.CAM

Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:brettcannon

… modules (pythonGH-92793)

As discussed in pythonGH-92611 and pythonGH-92564 and as a followup to PR pythonGH-92612 , this 3.11+ only PR uses the proper `deprecated-removed` role for the modules deprecated by PEP 593 (PEP-594) to clearly indicate to users that a removal version is planned and what it is, so they can prepare accordingly or voice any unanticipated impacts.

Related to pythonGH-92792 ; if we decide to backport that PR, the upgrade to using `deprecated-removed` on those functions can be moved to this one.
(cherry picked from commit 31fa41e)

Co-authored-by: CAM Gerlach <CAM.Gerlach@Gerlach.CAM>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

1 similar comment
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added skip news docs Documentation in the Doc dir awaiting review labels May 20, 2022
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@brettcannon brettcannon merged commit 24223ec into python:3.11 May 20, 2022
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-31fa41e-3.11 branch May 20, 2022 22:33
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants