Skip to content

fix: Repair index used to access tensor bindings #1998

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 8, 2023
Merged

Conversation

gs-olive
Copy link
Collaborator

@gs-olive gs-olive commented Jun 7, 2023

Description

  • TRT Index should be used to access tensor names, as opposed to pytorch index

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Checklist:

  • [ x ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project (You can use the linters)
  • [ x ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • [ x ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas and hacks
  • [ x ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • [ x ] I have added tests to verify my fix or my feature
  • [ x ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • [ x ] I have added the relevant labels to my PR in so that relevant reviewers are notified

- TRT Index should be used to access tensor names, as opposed to pytorch
index
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code conforms to C++ style guidelines

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code conforms to C++ style guidelines

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code conforms to Python style guidelines

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code conforms to Python style guidelines

Copy link
Collaborator

@narendasan narendasan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM pending CI

@gs-olive gs-olive merged commit bf4474d into main Jun 8, 2023
@gs-olive gs-olive deleted the core_runtime_fix branch June 8, 2023 02:03
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants