Skip to content

Add tensorrt test workflow #3266

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 24 commits into from
Nov 14, 2024
Merged

Add tensorrt test workflow #3266

merged 24 commits into from
Nov 14, 2024

Conversation

lanluo-nvidia
Copy link
Collaborator

@lanluo-nvidia lanluo-nvidia commented Oct 28, 2024

Description

Added the tensorrt test workflow:
example run:
https://github.com/pytorch/TensorRT/actions/runs/11675576873/job/32510381587?pr=3266

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant and/or add your own.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project (You can use the linters)
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas and hacks
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests to verify my fix or my feature
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have added the relevant labels to my PR in so that relevant reviewers are notified

@lanluo-nvidia lanluo-nvidia added the WIP Work is in progress, pull request should not be merged yet label Oct 28, 2024
@lanluo-nvidia lanluo-nvidia self-assigned this Oct 28, 2024
@lanluo-nvidia lanluo-nvidia removed the WIP Work is in progress, pull request should not be merged yet label Nov 5, 2024
@lanluo-nvidia lanluo-nvidia changed the title Add tensorrt test workflow (WIP) Add tensorrt test workflow Nov 5, 2024
@lanluo-nvidia lanluo-nvidia marked this pull request as ready for review November 5, 2024 03:31
Copy link
Collaborator

@narendasan narendasan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mostly seems fine

@github-actions github-actions bot added component: lowering Issues re: The lowering / preprocessing passes component: api [Python] Issues re: Python API component: dynamo Issues relating to the `torch.compile` or `torch._dynamo.export` paths labels Nov 12, 2024
@lanluo-nvidia lanluo-nvidia changed the base branch from main to lluo/decomposition_upstream_change November 12, 2024 22:44
@narendasan
Copy link
Collaborator

Seems like 12.1 got dropped is that us or PyTorch?

@lanluo-nvidia
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Seems like 12.1 got dropped is that us or PyTorch?

@narendasan
yes, cuda 12.1 is deprecated by pytorch, it was merged in just a few hours ago.
pytorch/test-infra#5904

Very wierd is that cuda11.8 is still supported, they only deprecated cuda12.1

@lanluo-nvidia lanluo-nvidia changed the base branch from lluo/decomposition_upstream_change to main November 13, 2024 18:16
@lanluo-nvidia lanluo-nvidia changed the base branch from main to lluo/decomposition_upstream_change November 13, 2024 18:16
@github-actions github-actions bot added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation and removed component: lowering Issues re: The lowering / preprocessing passes component: api [Python] Issues re: Python API component: dynamo Issues relating to the `torch.compile` or `torch._dynamo.export` paths labels Nov 13, 2024
@lanluo-nvidia lanluo-nvidia changed the base branch from lluo/decomposition_upstream_change to main November 13, 2024 21:33
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Nov 14, 2024
@lanluo-nvidia lanluo-nvidia merged commit a38bee7 into main Nov 14, 2024
12 checks passed
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants