Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Avoid requiring atomics on quickjs-libc #613

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024
Merged

Avoid requiring atomics on quickjs-libc #613

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024

Conversation

saghul
Copy link
Contributor

@saghul saghul commented Oct 22, 2024

No description provided.

@saghul saghul requested a review from bnoordhuis October 22, 2024 05:52
@saghul
Copy link
Contributor Author

saghul commented Oct 22, 2024

@bnoordhuis PTAL, not sure if TSAN will be happy, let's see.

@saghul
Copy link
Contributor Author

saghul commented Oct 22, 2024

@saghul
Copy link
Contributor Author

saghul commented Oct 22, 2024

All good! WDYT Ben? I think it's kinda nice to put it there in the runtime state.

Copy link
Contributor

@bnoordhuis bnoordhuis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now do os_pending_signals next :-)

Co-authored-by: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
@saghul saghul merged commit 995de25 into master Oct 22, 2024
15 checks passed
@saghul saghul deleted the libc-no-atomic branch October 22, 2024 08:25
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants