-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 152
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Use stdbool rather than custom booleans #821
Conversation
ef5b966
to
ffc3161
Compare
@bnoordhuis Can you pl take a quick peek? This became larger than I thought, but it did show that we were being a bit inconsistent with the boolean vs "boolean but -1 for exception" case. I feel this makes things more obvious. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No real comments, looks fine to me. Was there anything in particular I should pay attention to?
I'd like an extra pair of eyes on the strict layout changes, but I need to have another look so I'll @ you again :-) |
93400f1
to
ffc3161
Compare
@bnoordhuis This is now ready for review. In the end there are no struct layout changes. Replacing the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
RSLGTM
250521a
to
df06917
Compare
Fixes: #817