Skip to content

eta and beta aren't nicely compatible with n-ary functions #258

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rfindler
Copy link
Member

@rfindler rfindler commented Jan 4, 2023

... and the existing code in long-tut was wrong, as found by random testing.

After some discussion with @mfelleisen the best approach seems to be to just get rid of n-ary lambda expressions, so this pull request is a work-in-progress to do that.

@rfindler rfindler force-pushed the remove-nary-lambda-from-long-tut branch from 84a3cff to 755d5fc Compare January 20, 2023 23:48
@rfindler rfindler force-pushed the remove-nary-lambda-from-long-tut branch from 755d5fc to cd2108e Compare February 8, 2023 15:53
@rfindler rfindler force-pushed the remove-nary-lambda-from-long-tut branch from cd2108e to cf630a5 Compare April 28, 2023 23:56
github-actions[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

github-actions[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

github-actions[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resyntax analyzed 0 files in this pull request and found no issues.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant