mips-32 calling convention typo fixed

[guedou]

Here is a small fix to a typo discovered while reading calling convention definitions.

[Maijin]

If you could add test for this that would be great !

[guedou]

I tried the following, but I could not find a way to provide the (fake) prototype of r2_uni_test. Is it possible to do it dynamically ?

rasm2 -a mips 'ADDI A0, A0, 1; ADDI A1, A0, 1; ADDI A2, A1, 1; ADDI A3, A2, 1; JAL 0x28' -B > test.bin
r2 -a mips test.bin -qc 'e asm.emu=true; af+ 0x28 1 r2_unit_test; pd 5'

[radare]

By prototype you mean the function signature? You must run an variable analysis loop. @oddcoder may probably help and improve that. I think he only worked on x86 no mips at all. You should be able to load function definitions from .h files

…

On 11 Jan 2017, at 15:24, Guillaume Valadon ***@***.***> wrote: I tried the following, but I could not find a way to provide the (fake) prototype of r2_uni_test. Is it possible to do it dynamically ? rasm2 -a mips 'ADDI A0, A0, 1; ADDI A1, A0, 1; ADDI A2, A1, 1; ADDI A3, A2, 1; JAL 0x28' -B > test.bin r2 -a mips test.bin -qc 'e asm.emu=true; af+ 0x28 1 r2_unit_test; pd 5' — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.