Lint checks in CI runs

[shacharPash]

No description provided.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: 15 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (ac897cc) 94.07% compared to head (60510b9) 94.06%.
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #183      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.07%   94.06%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          82       82              
  Lines        5116     5109       -7     
  Branches      483      483              
==========================================
- Hits         4813     4806       -7     
  Misses        176      176              
  Partials      127      127              

Files	Coverage Δ
src/NRedisStack/Gears/GearsCommandBuilder.cs	98.14% <100.00%> (ø)
src/NRedisStack/Gears/GearsCommands.cs	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/NRedisStack/Gears/GearsCommandsAsync.cs	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/NRedisStack/Graph/DataTypes/Edge.cs	97.22% <100.00%> (ø)
src/NRedisStack/Graph/DataTypes/Node.cs	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/NRedisStack/Graph/DataTypes/Path.cs	94.73% <100.00%> (ø)
src/NRedisStack/Graph/GraphCache.cs	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/NRedisStack/Graph/GraphCacheList.cs	97.36% <ø> (ø)
src/NRedisStack/Graph/GraphCommands.cs	94.44% <ø> (ø)
src/NRedisStack/Graph/GraphCommandsAsync.cs	94.44% <ø> (ø)
... and 40 more

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[chayim]

@shacharPash WDYT about having CI check this as a linter job? Not actually changing, but failing if not applied? This would bring it inline with other clients. For example: redis-py or go