Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Replace redpencilio and remove -service #1

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

madnificent
Copy link
Member

  • replaces redpencilio to redpencil but leaves other repo namespaces in
    tact.

  • removes -service from the repository name as this normally exists on
    GitHub but not on Docker Hub (on all builds).

Next steps

Also update the build for the frontend.

- replaces redpencilio to redpencil but leaves other repo namespaces in
  tact.

- removes -service from the repository name as this normally exists on
  GitHub but not on Docker Hub (on all builds).
Github has redpencilio as org name, docker hub has redpencil.  This
automatically replaces and does not ruin other builds.
@nvdk
Copy link
Contributor

nvdk commented Aug 24, 2021

I like these as examples for how to modify the params with string operations, probably a good idea to update the readme as well. As you mentioned yourself (and a reminder so we don't forget), stripping service from a frontend doens't make a lot of sense.

On stripping service, it looks like that's not a practice we follow on LBLOD. It can still be part of the template if we want that to be the default though.

A frontend will not have a redundant -service postfix in its name.  A
suggestion to remove this adds complexity and raises the chance for
errors.
The templates have been altered.  Updating the README so it's more
obvious what is going on.
@madnificent madnificent requested a review from nvdk July 30, 2022 19:39
@nvdk
Copy link
Contributor

nvdk commented Jan 29, 2024

@madnificent apologies, this never got merged an we've since moved our preference to woodpecker. I'll leave it up to you whether you want to rebase your PR or close it.

@madnificent
Copy link
Member Author

Can someone else pick this up? Should be applied to woodpecker too.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants