-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Implement EIP-1898 in RSKj RPC methods #17
Comments
Issue Status: 1. Open 2. Started 3. Submitted 4. Done This issue now has a funding of 0.0337 RBTC (2092.64 USD @ $62096.0/RBTC) attached to it.
|
Issue Status: 1. Open 2. Started 3. Submitted 4. Done Work has been started. These users each claimed they can complete the work by 1 week, 2 days from now. 1) skarchon has started work. Implement EIP-1898 In RSKj RPC Methods Working on Implement EIP-1898 In RSKj RPC Methods Looking to implement a new method that solves this issue. Learn more on the Gitcoin Issue Details page. |
NOTE: Updated to remove |
Issue Status: 1. Open 2. Started 3. Submitted 4. Done Work for 0.0337 RBTC (1806.42 USD @ $53609.0/RBTC) has been submitted by:
|
Issue Status: 1. Open 2. Started 3. Submitted 4. Done Work for 0.0337 RBTC (1872.51 USD @ $49671.0/RBTC) has been submitted by: @bguiz please take a look at the submitted work:
|
Implement EIP-1898 in RSKj RPC methods
Prize Bounty
0.03370 RBTC
(approximately 2100 USD at time of posting)
Challenge Description
Modify RSKj’s implementation for the following RPC methods to support
EIP-1898:
eth_getBalance
eth_getStorageAt
eth_getTransactionCount
eth_getCode
eth_call
The full details of the change required in these RPC methods’ implementations is specified in EIP-1898. A quick summary of it would be to state that these RPC methods should also additionally accept not just the existing string formats, but now also accept objects, similar to the following:
{ "blockNumber": "0x0" }
{ "blockHash": "0xf88529d4ab262c0f4d042e9d8d3f2472848eaafe1a9b7213f57617eb40a9f9e0", "requireCanonical": false }
Both of the above should reference RSK’s genesis block when used in the above RPC methods.
Submission Requirements
The submission is expected to be:
RSKj repository
Judging Criteria
Winner Announcement Date
More information
RSK Slack,
and check out the
#gitcoin2021
channel.Developer Portal.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: