-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
cargo check
fails oddly on binaries
#3419
Comments
looking into this... |
This appears to be fixed by #3425. Will submit a PR with a test... |
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 26, 2016
Test for #3419 Based on top of #3425. I'm not sure if this is an acceptable test because it downloads rustc-serialize. r? @alexcrichton
2 tasks
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 25, 2024
Remove unnecessary test This removes a test that is blocking rust-lang/rust#116016 from landing. `@dtolnay` suggested removing the test rather than allowing the relevant lints ([comment](rust-lang/rust#116016 (comment))). > The failure is in https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/blob/77506e57392d94450bb3ed52cf75e3263bbb2792/tests/testsuite/check.rs#L222-L285 which is a 7 year old test for [#3419](#3419), which is from 2 days after the initial implementation of `cargo check` landed in nightly Cargo in [#3296](#3296). > > I would recommend just deleting the test from Cargo. The implementation of `cargo check` has matured enough since then and I don't see anything useful in that test.
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Not entirely sure what's going on here....
With that structure:
@nrc mind taking a look?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: