-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
refactor(vendor): tiny not important refactors #13610
Conversation
src/cargo/ops/vendor.rs
Outdated
let dst = relative | ||
.iter() | ||
.fold(dst.to_owned(), |acc, component| acc.join(&component)); | ||
let dst = dst.join(relative); | ||
|
||
paths::create_dir_all(dst.parent().unwrap())?; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I assume this comment is relevant here
I believe std::path::Path should be quite cross-platform compatible, as [it calls into something like GetFullPathNameW eventually when being used. I might be wrong though.
I assume this was done for a reason though so I'm a bit cautious and would like input from others.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems like #6198 is relevant?
If it already contains \\?\
then GetFullPathNameW
won't be called. I'll drop the commit instead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This evil behavior is deeply rooted in Cargo 😞.
78f52fe
to
9f96d7b
Compare
@bors r+ |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Update cargo 13 commits in d438c80c45c24be676ef5867edc79d0a14910efe..a510712d05c6c98f987af24dd73cdfafee8922e6 2024-03-19 16:11:22 +0000 to 2024-03-25 03:45:54 +0000 - Remove unnecessary test (rust-lang/cargo#13637) - Use `gitoxide` for `list_files_git` (rust-lang/cargo#13592) - fix: Warn on -Zlints (rust-lang/cargo#13632) - feat: Add a basic linting system (rust-lang/cargo#13621) - docs: remove untrue TODO for `native_dirs` (rust-lang/cargo#13631) - refactor(testsuite): Rename lints to lints_table (rust-lang/cargo#13627) - Fix debuginfo strip when using `--target` (rust-lang/cargo#13618) - refactor(toml): Push diagnostic complexity on annotate-snippets (rust-lang/cargo#13619) - Fix publish script due to crates.io CDN change (rust-lang/cargo#13614) - fix(alias): dont panic when resolving an empty alias (rust-lang/cargo#13613) - Update annotate snippets (rust-lang/cargo#13609) - refactor(vendor): tiny not important refactors (rust-lang/cargo#13610) - feat: Report some dependency changes on any command (rust-lang/cargo#13561) r? ghost
Update cargo 13 commits in d438c80c45c24be676ef5867edc79d0a14910efe..a510712d05c6c98f987af24dd73cdfafee8922e6 2024-03-19 16:11:22 +0000 to 2024-03-25 03:45:54 +0000 - Remove unnecessary test (rust-lang/cargo#13637) - Use `gitoxide` for `list_files_git` (rust-lang/cargo#13592) - fix: Warn on -Zlints (rust-lang/cargo#13632) - feat: Add a basic linting system (rust-lang/cargo#13621) - docs: remove untrue TODO for `native_dirs` (rust-lang/cargo#13631) - refactor(testsuite): Rename lints to lints_table (rust-lang/cargo#13627) - Fix debuginfo strip when using `--target` (rust-lang/cargo#13618) - refactor(toml): Push diagnostic complexity on annotate-snippets (rust-lang/cargo#13619) - Fix publish script due to crates.io CDN change (rust-lang/cargo#13614) - fix(alias): dont panic when resolving an empty alias (rust-lang/cargo#13613) - Update annotate snippets (rust-lang/cargo#13609) - refactor(vendor): tiny not important refactors (rust-lang/cargo#13610) - feat: Report some dependency changes on any command (rust-lang/cargo#13561) r? ghost
What does this PR try to resolve?
Did some tiny refactors in cargo vendor I found when working on other stuff.
How should we test and review this PR?
I believestd::path::Path
should be quite cross-platform compatible, as [it calls into something likeGetFullPathNameW
eventually when being used. I might be wrong though.See #13610 (comment)
Additional information