Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Don't re-look-up tables to avoid dots problem #2787

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 17, 2016

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

If a links value has a . in the name Cargo would previously panic, but this
alters the code to be more principled about lookup in tables to ensure that we
don't misinterpret the names.

Closes #2786

If a `links` value has a `.` in the name Cargo would previously panic, but this
alters the code to be more principled about lookup in tables to ensure that we
don't misinterpret the names.

Closes rust-lang#2786
@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @wycats

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

r? @brson

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned brson and unassigned wycats Jun 17, 2016
@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Jun 17, 2016

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 17, 2016

📌 Commit 53b7422 has been approved by brson

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2016
Don't re-look-up tables to avoid dots problem

If a `links` value has a `.` in the name Cargo would previously panic, but this
alters the code to be more principled about lookup in tables to ensure that we
don't misinterpret the names.

Closes #2786
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 17, 2016

⌛ Testing commit 53b7422 with merge 1d6b639...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 17, 2016

@bors bors merged commit 53b7422 into rust-lang:master Jun 17, 2016
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the links-with-dots branch July 1, 2016 17:37
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants