Add support for RUSTDOCFLAGS #2794
Conversation
Like with RUSTFLAGS, parse this variable to pass along extra arguments to invocations of `rustdoc`.
|
r? @wycats (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
r? @brson |
|
Hm, rustdoc's interface is much less scrutinized than |
|
Yeah it's true that most things I wouldn't want to expose, but the motivation here is twofold for me at least:
Ideally we'd provide configuration in |
|
@brson, thoughts on how this is consistent with |
|
@bors r+ I suppose I don't care enough to argue against it. |
|
📌 Commit f639d38 has been approved by |
Add support for RUSTDOCFLAGS Like with RUSTFLAGS, parse this variable to pass along extra arguments to invocations of `rustdoc`.
|
☀️ Test successful - cargo-cross-linux, cargo-linux-32, cargo-linux-64, cargo-mac-32, cargo-mac-64, cargo-win-gnu-32, cargo-win-gnu-64, cargo-win-msvc-32, cargo-win-msvc-64 |
Like with RUSTFLAGS, parse this variable to pass along extra arguments to
invocations of
rustdoc.