Skip to content

Resolver test/debug cleanup #7045

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jun 21, 2019
Merged

Conversation

Eh2406
Copy link
Contributor

@Eh2406 Eh2406 commented Jun 19, 2019

This is several small things salvaged from abandoned PRs and implemented on top of #7011

In working on this I noted that the prop tests are very sensitive to whether backtrace are turned on. Maybe we should set that env to 0 for that builder?

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @nrc

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 19, 2019
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+

Maybe we should set that env to 0 for that builder?

Sounds reasonable to me!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 21, 2019

📌 Commit cb95f5e has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 21, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 21, 2019

⌛ Testing commit cb95f5e with merge 37cb9bb...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2019
Resolver test/debug cleanup

This is several small things salvaged from abandoned PRs and implemented on top of #7011

In working on this I noted that the prop tests are very sensitive to whether backtrace are turned on. Maybe we should set that env to 0 for that builder?
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 21, 2019

☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: alexcrichton
Pushing 37cb9bb to master...

@bors bors merged commit cb95f5e into rust-lang:master Jun 21, 2019
@Eh2406 Eh2406 deleted the resolver-test/debug-cleanup branch June 21, 2019 23:34
bors added a commit to rust-lang/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2019
Update cargo

17 commits in 807429e1b6da4e2ec52488ef2f59e77068c31e1f..4c1fa54d10f58d69ac9ff55be68e1b1c25ecb816
2019-06-11 14:06:10 +0000 to 2019-06-24 11:24:18 +0000
- Fix typo in comment (rust-lang/cargo#7066)
- travis: enforce formatting of subcrates as well (rust-lang/cargo#7063)
- _cargo: Make function style consistent (rust-lang/cargo#7060)
- Update some fix comments. (rust-lang/cargo#7061)
- Stabilize default-run (rust-lang/cargo#7056)
- Fix typo in comment (rust-lang/cargo#7054)
- fix(fingerpring): do not touch intermediate artifacts (rust-lang/cargo#7050)
- Resolver test/debug cleanup (rust-lang/cargo#7045)
- Rename to_url → into_url (rust-lang/cargo#7048)
- Remove needless lifetimes (rust-lang/cargo#7047)
- Revert test directory cleaning change. (rust-lang/cargo#7042)
- cargo book /reference/manifest: fix typo (rust-lang/cargo#7041)
- Extract resolver tests to their own crate (rust-lang/cargo#7011)
- ci: Do not install addons on rustfmt build jobs (rust-lang/cargo#7038)
- Support absolute paths in dep-info files (rust-lang/cargo#7030)
- ci: Run cargo fmt on all workspaces (rust-lang/cargo#7033)
- Deprecated ONCE_INIT in favor of Once::new() (rust-lang/cargo#7031)
@ehuss ehuss added this to the 1.37.0 milestone Feb 6, 2022
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants