-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 386
Drop support for missing MIR #211
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Comments
cc @RalfJung |
Sounds fair enough. I am not sure about the first point -- I actually feel like miri really should have some more sophisticated logging infrastructure, so that I can selectively turn on/off tracing for different modules or so. And some things are pretty hard to see despite all the verbosity of a full trace, like which arguments are passed on a function call. I suppose this is blocked by #202? |
You can already do the module-wise logging. We use |
Okay so it's mostly a matter of documentation then. And maybe of organizing things do that the outputs of individual modules make more sense. ;) Like, I may want to say "trace instructions that are executed", which should exactly print every stmt and terminator that is executed, and nothing else. But I don't want to see details like symbol resolution or vtable caches. |
We can remove the blocker on #202 by a) adding appveyor and a travis mac build Though a) would remove the feature that miri can easily interpret stuff for other targets. |
One checkbox solved by #351 |
I think we are basically ready to do this -- except that #202 is still open. @oli-obk do you think that should block this? Can we at least get a Travis runner with a 32bit platform to make sure those are covered for a unix system as well? Also you added "add some flag to not report the libstd boilerplate in MIRI_LOG" to the list. That'd be nice to have but I'd prefer to not block on this, and open an issue instead. |
I moved it out to a separate issue. |
feat: add unstable sorting methods
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Stuff to do
exchange_malloc
in thebox
unopThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: