Strengthen C++20 SC accesses #2512
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #2455) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
RalfJung
reviewed
Aug 27, 2022
|
Thanks! LGTM, apart from the comment. |
|
@bors r+ |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@SabrinaJewson noted in #2301 that Miri could produce behaviours forbidden under C++20 even without SC fences. Due to the added coherence-ordered before relationship which is created from read from and read before, plus the fact that coherence-ordered before between SC operations must be consistent with the Global Total Order S, in C++20 if there's an SC load that reads from any store, then a later SC load cannot read before that store. This PR adds this restriction