Skip to content

Update for field reordering #43

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 4, 2017
Merged

Update for field reordering #43

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 4, 2017

Conversation

bennyyip
Copy link
Contributor

@Gankra
Copy link
Contributor

Gankra commented Dec 4, 2017

Hey sorry for the delay! I think it would be better to just remove the note altogether? I think I just added this to avoid getting complaints about "why doesn't the compiler do this the book said so!"

what do you think?

@bennyyip
Copy link
Contributor Author

bennyyip commented Dec 4, 2017

Great idea! Moreover, maybe we should replace it with something like: "Rust compiler does field reordering when not using repr(c)", make it more clear to the reader.

@Gankra
Copy link
Contributor

Gankra commented Dec 4, 2017

I think that's the whole point of this section, (and the one on repr(C)), so I don't think that will be necessary.

@bennyyip
Copy link
Contributor Author

bennyyip commented Dec 4, 2017

Ok, I removed the notes.

Copy link
Contributor

@Gankra Gankra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants