Skip to content

Clean up some inline assembly examples #1804

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 3, 2025

Conversation

ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

@ehuss ehuss commented Apr 28, 2025

These examples all include an extraneous let x = 5;, where the x variable is never used anywhere. Presumably this was a copy-paste scenario with similar tests that do use x. I'm removing these since the extra variable could distract from the intent of the example.

These examples all include an extraneous `let x = 5;`, where the `x`
variable is never used anywhere. Presumably this was a copy-paste
scenario with similar tests that do use `x`. I'm removing these since
the extra variable could distract from the intent of the example.
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: The marked PR is awaiting review from a maintainer label Apr 28, 2025
@ehuss ehuss added this pull request to the merge queue May 3, 2025
Merged via the queue into rust-lang:master with commit a763960 May 3, 2025
5 checks passed
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request May 5, 2025
Update books

## rust-lang/reference

9 commits in 3bf3402aea982b876eb56c87da17b0685c6461d5..387392674d74656f7cb437c05a96f0c52ea8e601
2025-05-03 21:29:09 UTC to 2025-04-22 15:25:03 UTC

- Document `let_chains` again (rust-lang/reference#1740)
- Add: orphan rule rationale. (rust-lang/reference#1755)
- Remove apologies about the Reference (rust-lang/reference#1792)
- Clean up some inline assembly examples (rust-lang/reference#1804)
- Remove StructExprTuple and StructExprUnit (rust-lang/reference#1803)
- Improve documentation of struct expressions (rust-lang/reference#1799)
- Clarify interaction of asm-goto with IBT (rust-lang/reference#1790)
- naked functions (rust-lang/reference#1689)
- Relabel grammarRailroad-Button (rust-lang/reference#1798)

## rust-lang/rust-by-example

3 commits in 0d7964d5b22cf920237ef1282d869564b4883b88..8a8918c698534547fa8a1a693cb3e7277f0bfb2f
2025-04-30 12:20:49 UTC to 2025-04-22 17:42:30 UTC

-   The example is not meant to be compiled. Changed the code block ann… (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1926)
- Non-tail recursive call note in testcase_linked_list.md (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1924)
- docs: mark illustrative 'static lifetime example with `ignore` (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1923)
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#140676 - rustbot:docs-update, r=ehuss

Update books

## rust-lang/reference

9 commits in 3bf3402aea982b876eb56c87da17b0685c6461d5..387392674d74656f7cb437c05a96f0c52ea8e601
2025-05-03 21:29:09 UTC to 2025-04-22 15:25:03 UTC

- Document `let_chains` again (rust-lang/reference#1740)
- Add: orphan rule rationale. (rust-lang/reference#1755)
- Remove apologies about the Reference (rust-lang/reference#1792)
- Clean up some inline assembly examples (rust-lang/reference#1804)
- Remove StructExprTuple and StructExprUnit (rust-lang/reference#1803)
- Improve documentation of struct expressions (rust-lang/reference#1799)
- Clarify interaction of asm-goto with IBT (rust-lang/reference#1790)
- naked functions (rust-lang/reference#1689)
- Relabel grammarRailroad-Button (rust-lang/reference#1798)

## rust-lang/rust-by-example

3 commits in 0d7964d5b22cf920237ef1282d869564b4883b88..8a8918c698534547fa8a1a693cb3e7277f0bfb2f
2025-04-30 12:20:49 UTC to 2025-04-22 17:42:30 UTC

-   The example is not meant to be compiled. Changed the code block ann… (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1926)
- Non-tail recursive call note in testcase_linked_list.md (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1924)
- docs: mark illustrative 'static lifetime example with `ignore` (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1923)
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: The marked PR is awaiting review from a maintainer
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants