Skip to content

Rollup of 4 Pull requests with new lints #4839

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Nov 23, 2019

Conversation

flip1995
Copy link
Member

Rollup of pull requests

changelog: add [zst_offset] lint
changelog: New lint: [ifs_same_cond_fn]
cahngelog: Add new lint [large_stack_arrays]
changelog: added lint [tabs_in_doc_comments]

basil-cow and others added 11 commits November 13, 2019 21:44
added documentation

minor style fix

change as to ::from

add ignore to doc

include threshold in lint message/make suggestion more apparent/use Scalar api instead of matching

style fix

shange snippet_opt to snippet
Run ./util/dev

Revert changelog entry

Rename lint to same_functions_in_if_condition and add a doc example

Add testcases with different arg in fn invocation
@flip1995
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ p=4

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 23, 2019

📌 Commit 7cc8fa2 has been approved by flip1995

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 23, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 7cc8fa2 with merge 35a559f...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2019
Rollup of 4 Pull requests with new lints

Rollup of pull requests

- #4816 (New lint: zst_offset)
- #4814 (New lint: Implement ifs_same_cond_fn)
- #4807 (Add `large_stack_arrays` lint)
- #4806 (Issue/4623)

changelog: add [`zst_offset`] lint
changelog: New lint: [`ifs_same_cond_fn`]
cahngelog: Add new lint [large_stack_arrays]
changelog: added lint [`tabs_in_doc_comments`]
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 23, 2019

☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: flip1995
Pushing 35a559f to master...

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants