std::num::Checked{Add,Sub,Mul,Div} should have type parameters
#13510
Comments
|
These no longer exist in tree. This issue has been moved to the num repo: rust-num/num#59 |
Dylan-DPC
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC/rust
that referenced
this issue
Nov 1, 2022
feat: Clicking the status bar item stops and starts the server
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust
that referenced
this issue
Oct 18, 2024
…ssify, r=llogiq Cleanup `const_float_classify` As mentioned at rust-lang#13508 `const_float_classify` has been stabilized recently in rust-lang#130157 and can be cleanup Close rust-lang#13508 changelog: [none]
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
The corresponding
std::opstraits have both the type of right hand side operand and the type of result, whileChecked*traits do not (and always assume that both operands and result have the same type). There is no real reason to makeChecked*traits behave differently fromstd::opstraits, and having them as is hampers advanced uses of operator overloading: for example, if the scalar type (e.g.DateTime) and difference type (e.g.Duration) are distinct from each other then the current scheme wouldn't work at all.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: