-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Smarter integration of projection predicates into trait selection #20297
Labels
Comments
cc me |
Triage: no idea what's going on with this, and it's very, very old. @nikomatsakis is this still relevant? |
Is this still relevant? It's a very old issue, and it seems there was some progress judging by the items in GH's log. |
This is all still relevant but I feel this issue adds approximately zero value. Closing. |
nivkner
added a commit
to nivkner/rust
that referenced
this issue
Oct 7, 2017
update FIXME(rust-lang#6298) to point to open issue 15020 update FIXME(rust-lang#6268) to point to RFC 811 update FIXME(rust-lang#10520) to point to RFC 1751 remove FIXME for emscripten issue 4563 and include target in `test_estimate_scaling_factor` remove FIXME(rust-lang#18207) since node_id isn't used for `ref` pattern analysis remove FIXME(rust-lang#6308) since DST was implemented in rust-lang#12938 remove FIXME(rust-lang#2658) since it was decided to not reorganize module remove FIXME(rust-lang#20590) since it was decided to stay conservative with projection types remove FIXME(rust-lang#20297) since it was decided that solving the issue is unnecessary remove FIXME(rust-lang#27086) since closures do correspond to structs now remove FIXME(rust-lang#13846) and enable `function_sections` for windows remove mention of rust-lang#22079 in FIXME(rust-lang#22079) since this is a general FIXME remove FIXME(rust-lang#5074) since the restriction on borrow were lifted
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
The current logic that integrates projection predicates into trait selection is somewhat flawed. I made some simplifying choices:
These all feel a bit like corner cases for now and I think we can get away with leaving things as they are and later coming in with a much smarter trait selection system. It's clear that we're pushing the bounds of the current setup. Trait reform 2.0 anybody?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: