-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Consider moving some docs from alloc::arc to alloc::arc::Arc #32905
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Comments
part of #29377 |
I would be happy to work with anyone who wants to work on this issue. |
@steveklabnik Can I work on this one? @Ms2ger Do you mean the lack of more information regarding |
I think everything on the module page would be more discoverable on the type page; the module page could then be limited to its first line and a link to the type page. |
@izgzhen sure thing! In general, the module page should provide an overview of the module. And each type's page should provide an in-depth view of the type. This module is very tiny, only encompassing |
…eveklabnik Improve arc doc, fixing rust-lang#32905 As issue rust-lang#32905 detailed, I moved part of the module doc to the struct doc, and fixed some small places in the `alloc::arc`.
Looks like this can be closed? |
Yes, thanks! |
http://static.rust-lang.org/doc/master/alloc/arc/index.html has some useful docs, which are somewhat hard to find. In particular, someone on IRC misconstrued the more terse documentation on the
Arc
type itself to mean that it magically allowed mutable access.CC @steveklabnik
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: