-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.4k
Rust 1.15 source tarball does not contain x.py #39476
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Labels
P-high
High priority
T-bootstrap
Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
Milestone
Comments
This is on beta and nightly too. |
alexcrichton
added a commit
to alexcrichton/rust
that referenced
this issue
Feb 3, 2017
We should be sure to add our build system entry point! Closes rust-lang#39476
frewsxcv
added a commit
to frewsxcv/rust
that referenced
this issue
Feb 4, 2017
rustbuild: Add x.py to source tarballs We should be sure to add our build system entry point! Closes rust-lang#39476
frewsxcv
added a commit
to frewsxcv/rust
that referenced
this issue
Feb 4, 2017
rustbuild: Add x.py to source tarballs We should be sure to add our build system entry point! Closes rust-lang#39476
frewsxcv
added a commit
to frewsxcv/rust
that referenced
this issue
Feb 5, 2017
rustbuild: Add x.py to source tarballs We should be sure to add our build system entry point! Closes rust-lang#39476
frewsxcv
added a commit
to frewsxcv/rust
that referenced
this issue
Feb 5, 2017
rustbuild: Add x.py to source tarballs We should be sure to add our build system entry point! Closes rust-lang#39476
Reeopening until the backport is fixed because I'm putting this on the release milestone. |
alexcrichton
added a commit
to alexcrichton/rust
that referenced
this issue
Feb 11, 2017
We should be sure to add our build system entry point! Closes rust-lang#39476
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Labels
P-high
High priority
T-bootstrap
Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
The build system that we just turned on is not actually in the source code.
cc @alexcrichton
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: