-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.4k
Incorrect "variant is never used" lint #44083
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Comments
Just to be clear: |
zackmdavis
added a commit
to zackmdavis/rust
that referenced
this issue
Nov 19, 2017
As reported in rust-lang#19140, rust-lang#44083, and rust-lang#44565, some users were confused when the dead-code lint reported an enum variant to be "unused" when it was matched on (but not constructed). This wording change makes it clearer that the lint is in fact checking for construction. We continue to say "used" for all other items (it's tempting to say "called" for functions and methods, but this turns out not to be correct: functions can be passed as arguments and the dead-code lint isn't special-casing that or anything). Resolves rust-lang#19140.
kennytm
added a commit
to kennytm/rust
that referenced
this issue
Nov 21, 2017
…y_never_constructed_for_variants, r=arielb1 dead code lint to say "never constructed" for variants As reported in rust-lang#19140, rust-lang#44083, and rust-lang#44565, some users were confused when the dead-code lint reported an enum variant to be "unused" when it was matched on (but not constructed). This wording change makes it clearer that the lint is in fact checking for construction. We continue to say "used" for all other items (it's tempting to say "called" for functions and methods, but this turns out not to be correct: functions can be passed as arguments and the dead-code lint isn't special-casing that or anything). Resolves rust-lang#19140. r? @pnkfelix
zackmdavis
added a commit
to zackmdavis/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jul 13, 2018
Respectively. This is a sequel to November 2017's rust-lang#46103 / 1a9dc2e. It had been reported (more than once—at least rust-lang#19140, rust-lang#44083, and rust-lang#44565) that the "never used" language was confusing for enum variants that were "used" as match patterns, so the wording was changed to say never "constructed" specifically for enum variants. More recently, the same issue was raised for structs (rust-lang#52325). It seems consistent to say "constructed" here, too, for the same reasons. While we're here, we can also use more specific word "called" for unused functions and methods. (We declined to do this in rust-lang#46103, but the rationale given in the commit message doesn't actually make sense.) This resolves rust-lang#52325.
Mark-Simulacrum
added a commit
to Mark-Simulacrum/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jul 13, 2018
…y_2_electric_boogaloo, r=pnkfelix dead-code lint: say "constructed", "called" for structs, functions Respectively. This is a sequel to November 2017's rust-lang#46103 / 1a9dc2e. It had been reported (more than once—at least rust-lang#19140, rust-lang#44083, and rust-lang#44565) that the "never used" language was confusing for enum variants that were "used" as match patterns, so the wording was changed to say never "constructed" specifically for enum variants. More recently, the same issue was raised for structs (rust-lang#52325). It seems consistent to say "constructed" here, too, for the same reasons. While we're here, we can also use more specific word "called" for unused functions and methods. (We declined to do this in rust-lang#46103, but the rationale given in the commit message doesn't actually make sense.) This resolves rust-lang#52325.
zackmdavis
added a commit
to zackmdavis/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jul 22, 2018
This is a sequel to November 2017's rust-lang#46103 / 1a9dc2e. It had been reported (more than once—at least rust-lang#19140, rust-lang#44083, and rust-lang#44565) that the "never used" language was confusing for enum variants that were "used" as match patterns, so the wording was changed to say never "constructed" specifically for enum variants. More recently, the same issue was raised for structs (rust-lang#52325). It seems consistent to say "constructed" here, too, for the same reasons. We considered using more specific word "called" for unused functions and methods (while we declined to do this in rust-lang#46103, the rationale given in the commit message doesn't actually make sense), but it turns out that Cargo's test suite expects the "never used" message, and maybe we don't care enough even to make a Cargo PR over such a petty and subjective wording change. This resolves rust-lang#52325.
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jul 31, 2018
…y_2_electric_boogaloo, r=pnkfelix dead-code lint: say "constructed" for structs Respectively. This is a sequel to November 2017's rust-lang#46103 / 1a9dc2e. It had been reported (more than once—at least rust-lang#19140, rust-lang#44083, and rust-lang#44565) that the "never used" language was confusing for enum variants that were "used" as match patterns, so the wording was changed to say never "constructed" specifically for enum variants. More recently, the same issue was raised for structs (rust-lang#52325). It seems consistent to say "constructed" here, too, for the same reasons. ~~While we're here, we can also use more specific word "called" for unused functions and methods. (We declined to do this in rust-lang#46103, but the rationale given in the commit message doesn't actually make sense.)~~ This resolves rust-lang#52325.
Mark-Simulacrum
added a commit
to Mark-Simulacrum/rust
that referenced
this issue
Aug 1, 2018
…y_2_electric_boogaloo, r=pnkfelix dead-code lint: say "constructed" for structs Respectively. This is a sequel to November 2017's rust-lang#46103 / 1a9dc2e. It had been reported (more than once—at least rust-lang#19140, rust-lang#44083, and rust-lang#44565) that the "never used" language was confusing for enum variants that were "used" as match patterns, so the wording was changed to say never "constructed" specifically for enum variants. More recently, the same issue was raised for structs (rust-lang#52325). It seems consistent to say "constructed" here, too, for the same reasons. ~~While we're here, we can also use more specific word "called" for unused functions and methods. (We declined to do this in rust-lang#46103, but the rationale given in the commit message doesn't actually make sense.)~~ This resolves rust-lang#52325.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 6, 2018
…c_boogaloo, r=pnkfelix dead-code lint: say "constructed" for structs Respectively. This is a sequel to November 2017's #46103 / 1a9dc2e. It had been reported (more than once—at least #19140, #44083, and #44565) that the "never used" language was confusing for enum variants that were "used" as match patterns, so the wording was changed to say never "constructed" specifically for enum variants. More recently, the same issue was raised for structs (#52325). It seems consistent to say "constructed" here, too, for the same reasons. ~~While we're here, we can also use more specific word "called" for unused functions and methods. (We declined to do this in #46103, but the rationale given in the commit message doesn't actually make sense.)~~ This resolves #52325.
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
A "variant is never used" lint is incorrectly triggered, presumably due to optimizations on MIR. I know my code sample looks pretty stupid as no human would write this, probably. But this kind of code might be generated. Anyway, the lint is incorrect I'd say.
I tried this code:
I expected to see this happen: no warning
Instead, this happened:
Meta
Happens with
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: