Skip to content

Tracking issue for non-panicking pow #48320

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

#

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
milesand opened this issue Feb 18, 2018 · 8 comments · Fixed by #57873
Closed

Tracking issue for non-panicking pow #48320

milesand opened this issue Feb 18, 2018 · 8 comments · Fixed by #57873
Labels
C-tracking-issue Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC disposition-merge This issue / PR is in PFCP or FCP with a disposition to merge it. finished-final-comment-period The final comment period is finished for this PR / Issue. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Comments

@milesand
Copy link
Contributor

milesand commented Feb 18, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Relevant PR: #48321
@frewsxcv frewsxcv added the C-tracking-issue Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC label Feb 18, 2018
@frewsxcv frewsxcv mentioned this issue Feb 18, 2018
Closed
@milesand milesand mentioned this issue Feb 19, 2018
Merged
@pietroalbini pietroalbini added the T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Feb 20, 2018
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this issue Feb 27, 2018
@kennytm
Rollup merge of rust-lang#48321 - milesand:no_panic_pow, r=alexcrichton
a6820ce 
Add non-panicking variants of pow for integer types

Currently, calling pow may panic in case of overflow, and the function does not have non-panicking counterparts. Thus, it would be beneficial to add those in.

Closes rust-lang#48291.
Relevant tracking issue: rust-lang#48320
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this issue Feb 28, 2018
@kennytm
Rollup merge of rust-lang#48321 - milesand:no_panic_pow, r=alexcrichton
85d7d0b 
Add non-panicking variants of pow for integer types

Currently, calling pow may panic in case of overflow, and the function does not have non-panicking counterparts. Thus, it would be beneficial to add those in.

Closes rust-lang#48291.
Relevant tracking issue: rust-lang#48320
@Restioson
Copy link

Can this be closed?

@milesand
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm sorry, it's been a while.

While this feature hasn't received much feedback by itself, but with already-stable similar functionalities present, I think this feature can be stabilized as-is.

I'm not familiar with the stabilization process though. What should I do here?

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Dec 21, 2018

@milesand any idea when this will be stabilized? Is it going to be stabilized?

@milesand
Copy link
Contributor Author

milesand commented Dec 22, 2018 •
edited
Loading

@alexcrichton Can we stabilize thie feature?

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@rfcbot fcp merge

Seems reasonable to me! The APIs being stabilized here (as I understand it) are:

i8::checked_pow(self, u32) -> Option<i8>
i8::saturating_pow(self, u32) -> i8
i8::wrapping_pow(self, u32) -> i8
i8::overflowing_pow(self, u32) -> (i8, bool)

(and similar for all other integral types)

@rfcbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rfcbot commented Jan 2, 2019 •
edited by sfackler
Loading

Team member @alexcrichton has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged teams:

No concerns currently listed.

Once a majority of reviewers approve (and none object), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up!

See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me.

@rfcbot rfcbot added proposed-final-comment-period Proposed to merge/close by relevant subteam, see T-<team> label. Will enter FCP once signed off. disposition-merge This issue / PR is in PFCP or FCP with a disposition to merge it. final-comment-period In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised. labels Jan 2, 2019
@rfcbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rfcbot commented Jan 2, 2019

🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔

@rfcbot rfcbot removed the proposed-final-comment-period Proposed to merge/close by relevant subteam, see T-<team> label. Will enter FCP once signed off. label Jan 2, 2019
@rfcbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rfcbot commented Jan 12, 2019

The final comment period, with a disposition to merge, as per the review above, is now complete.

@rfcbot rfcbot added finished-final-comment-period The final comment period is finished for this PR / Issue. and removed final-comment-period In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised. labels Jan 12, 2019
@milesand milesand mentioned this issue Jan 24, 2019
Merged
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this issue Jan 24, 2019
@Centril
Rollup merge of rust-lang#57873 - milesand:master, r=Centril
84dd79b 
Stabilize no_panic_pow

This would close rust-lang#48320.

I'm not sure if I've done this right, I've just changed attribute name to stable and set `since` to two minor versions above current stable since that seemed like what others were doing.
@bors bors closed this as completed in 5fa1016 Jan 25, 2019
@kantai kantai mentioned this issue Feb 4, 2019
Merged
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
C-tracking-issue Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC disposition-merge This issue / PR is in PFCP or FCP with a disposition to merge it. finished-final-comment-period The final comment period is finished for this PR / Issue. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Stabilize no_panic_pow milesand/rust
6 participants
@alexcrichton @frewsxcv @pietroalbini @Restioson @milesand @rfcbot