Skip to content

Auto-traits implementations shouldn't appear if empty #48882

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
GuillaumeGomez opened this issue Mar 9, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Auto-traits implementations shouldn't appear if empty #48882

GuillaumeGomez opened this issue Mar 9, 2018 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
C-bug Category: This is a bug. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Comments

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/env/struct.Args.html

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez added the T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Mar 9, 2018
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez self-assigned this Mar 9, 2018
@kennytm kennytm added the C-bug Category: This is a bug. label Mar 9, 2018
@clarfonthey
Copy link
Contributor

I'd argue that !Send and !Sync should show up in the auto traits section.

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

Hum no. It's a "manual" binding.

@clarfonthey
Copy link
Contributor

It depends on if you see it as "auto trait" implementations or auto "trait implementations"

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

There is nothing automatic in here so I don't see where the debate is. :-/

kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this issue Mar 12, 2018
…, r=QuietMisdreavus

Remove auto trait implementation section when empty

Fixes rust-lang#48882.
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
C-bug Category: This is a bug. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants