-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.4k
Tracking issue for extra floating-point logarithm constants #50540
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Comments
Has anyone used these constants at all and want to pitch in for stabilisation of these? These have landed for a while and I'm curious how many people are using them. |
+1 for stabilization. (Tried to see if log2(10) exists and found that it is unstable 🙄.) |
(Mind providing the specific use case? Curious to see if people are using this for anything other than scientific computing.) |
@clarcharr to estimate the "−log2(probability)" of collision of two values chosen randomly from a set, which will be used to derive the probability of collision of N values (≈ 1 − e-pN2/2, p ≪ 1, N ≫ 1). log2 is chosen instead of natural log because the set size is often 2n (e.g. u32), but sometimes it is drawn from a set of n decimal digits which would then involve n·log2(10). |
I can't @ anyone from the libs team but do you think we'd be able to start an FCP for this? |
cc @rust-lang/libs for a FCP. |
@rfcbot fcp merge I believe the stabilization includes |
Team member @alexcrichton has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged team members: No concerns currently listed. Once a majority of reviewers approve (and at most 2 approvals are outstanding), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up! See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me. |
🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔 |
The final comment period, with a disposition to merge, as per the review above, is now complete. As the automated representative of the governance process, I would like to thank the author for their work and everyone else who contributed. The RFC will be merged soon. |
@alexcrichton Does this need a stabilization report/PR? |
It needs a PR. Not sure if we should include |
@clarfon There is already #66770. |
Oh, my bad. I for some reason noticed that this issue got linked in the PR and thought that there wasn't a separate tracking issue. |
…ts, r=sfackler Stabilize {f32, f64}::{LOG2_10, LOG10_2} Following the decision to stabilize `LOG2_10` and `LOG10_2` in rust-lang#50540 (comment). Closes rust-lang#50540. r? @sfackler
Specifically,
LOG10_2
andLOG2_10
. PR: #50539The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: