Skip to content

Anchor to trait item in rustdoc does not expand the trait #70476

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
antoyo opened this issue Mar 27, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #70563
Closed

Anchor to trait item in rustdoc does not expand the trait #70476

antoyo opened this issue Mar 27, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #70563
Assignees
Labels
C-bug Category: This is a bug. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Comments

@antoyo
Copy link
Contributor

antoyo commented Mar 27, 2020

The link https://docs.rs/webkit2gtk/0.9.0/webkit2gtk/struct.WebViewClass.html#get_type.v does not expand the trait, so we don't see the anchor.

cc @GuillaumeGomez

@antoyo antoyo added the C-bug Category: This is a bug. label Mar 27, 2020
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez self-assigned this Mar 27, 2020
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez added the T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Mar 27, 2020
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this issue Jul 6, 2020
…r=ollie27,kinnison

[rustdoc] Page hash handling

Fixes rust-lang#70476

A good example to see the change is to use this URL: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/string/struct.String.html#from_iter.v-3

After the change, it actually goes to the target element (and change the page hash to something more clear for the users).

r? @kinnison

cc @ollie27
@bors bors closed this as completed in 218d96e Jul 7, 2020
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
C-bug Category: This is a bug. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants