Skip to content

rustpkg should use workcache #7075

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
catamorphism opened this issue Jun 12, 2013 · 3 comments
Closed

rustpkg should use workcache #7075

catamorphism opened this issue Jun 12, 2013 · 3 comments

Comments

@catamorphism
Copy link
Contributor

Sub-bug of #5677

rustpkg build should "work like make": it should only rebuild files whose dependencies have changed. (Currently, it rebuilds everything every time.) Doing this will involve using workcache, which has its own set of issues (see #4432).

@ghost ghost assigned catamorphism Jun 12, 2013
@huonw
Copy link
Member

huonw commented Jul 30, 2013

Visiting for triage; some improvements to workcache landed in #7885 (but #4432 is still open, and there are still a pile of FIXMEs in it).

@catamorphism
Copy link
Contributor Author

#9034 will close this.

@catamorphism
Copy link
Contributor Author

#9034 closed this. If other issues arise, file a more specific bug.

@catamorphism catamorphism removed their assignment Jun 16, 2014
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this issue Apr 22, 2021
…, r=camsteffen,flip1995

Fixing FPs for the `branches_sharing_code` lint

Fixes rust-lang#7053
Fixes rust-lang#7054
And an additional CSS adjustment to support dark mode for every inline code. It currently only works in paragraphs, which was an oversight on my part 😅. [Current Example](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#blacklisted_name)

This also includes ~50 lines of doc comments and is therefor not as big as the changes would indicate. 🐧

---

changelog: none

All of these bugs were introduced in this dev version and are therefor not worth a change log entry.

r? `@phansch`
cc: `@camsteffen` since you have a pretty good overview of the `SpanlessEq` implementation 🙃
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants