-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.4k
ICE on invalid input: fn f(){;
#74120
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Comments
Semicolon is not the main problem here. Standalone semicolons are allowed as items inside function body. Second function definition |
Prioritized as |
@rustbot claim |
A possibly clearer repro: https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=40cd60c27e0927eba22d2e9667f091e2 extern "C" {
fn f() {
fn g() {}
}
} |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
The previous issue has been fixed, let's try again (sorry for the noise!). |
Don't visit foreign function bodies when lowering ast to hir Previously the existence of bodies inside a foreign function block would cause a panic in the hir `NodeCollector` during its collection of crate bodies to compute a crate hash: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/e59b08e62ea691916d2f063cac5aab4634128022/src/librustc_middle/hir/map/collector.rs#L154-L158 The collector walks the hir tree and creates a map of hir nodes, then attaching bodies in the crate to their owner in the map. For a code like ```rust extern "C" { fn f() { fn g() {} } } ``` The crate bodies include the body of the function `g`. But foreign functions cannot have bodies, and while the parser AST permits a foreign function to have a body, the hir doesn't. This means that the body of `f` is not present in the hir, and so neither is `g`. So when the `NodeCollector` finishes the walking the hir, it has no record of `g`, cannot find an owner for the body of `g` it sees in the crate bodies, and blows up. Why do the crate bodies include the body of `g`? The AST walker has a need a for walking function bodies, and FFIs share the same AST node as functions in other contexts. There are at least two options to fix this: - Don't unwrap the map entry for an hir node in the `NodeCollector` - Modifier the ast->hir lowering visitor to ignore foreign function blocks I don't think the first is preferrable, since we want to know when we can't find a body for an hir node that we thought had one (dropping this information may lead to an invalid hash). So this commit implements the second option. Closes rust-lang#74120
Don't visit foreign function bodies when lowering ast to hir Previously the existence of bodies inside a foreign function block would cause a panic in the hir `NodeCollector` during its collection of crate bodies to compute a crate hash: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/e59b08e62ea691916d2f063cac5aab4634128022/src/librustc_middle/hir/map/collector.rs#L154-L158 The collector walks the hir tree and creates a map of hir nodes, then attaching bodies in the crate to their owner in the map. For a code like ```rust extern "C" { fn f() { fn g() {} } } ``` The crate bodies include the body of the function `g`. But foreign functions cannot have bodies, and while the parser AST permits a foreign function to have a body, the hir doesn't. This means that the body of `f` is not present in the hir, and so neither is `g`. So when the `NodeCollector` finishes the walking the hir, it has no record of `g`, cannot find an owner for the body of `g` it sees in the crate bodies, and blows up. Why do the crate bodies include the body of `g`? The AST walker has a need a for walking function bodies, and FFIs share the same AST node as functions in other contexts. There are at least two options to fix this: - Don't unwrap the map entry for an hir node in the `NodeCollector` - Modifier the ast->hir lowering visitor to ignore foreign function blocks I don't think the first is preferrable, since we want to know when we can't find a body for an hir node that we thought had one (dropping this information may lead to an invalid hash). So this commit implements the second option. Closes rust-lang#74120
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Code
Meta
rustc --version --verbose
:Also occurs on nightly at https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=b87d0d902d835c40f300071f4976ee62
Error output
Backtrace
This issue has been assigned to @ayazhafiz via this comment.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: