Skip to content

Incorrect "multiple matching crates" with duplicate path #7718

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

#

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
emberian opened this issue Jul 11, 2013 · 5 comments
Closed

Incorrect "multiple matching crates" with duplicate path #7718

emberian opened this issue Jul 11, 2013 · 5 comments
Labels
E-easy Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.

Comments

@emberian
Copy link
Member

For example, if you do rustc -L . -L ., and you have extern mod foo with a foo crate in ., it will report "multiple matching crates for foo", even though it's the same crate.
@emberian
Copy link
Member Author

What it should probably do is remove duplicates from addl_lib_search_paths in the session::options

@Xazax-hun
Copy link
Contributor

Or alternatively make addl_lib_search_paths to be a set?

@emberian
Copy link
Member Author

That'd work, I can't imagine why one would need to index into it.

@metajack
Copy link
Contributor

nominating production ready. this is likely to catch people out who are using makefiles.

@catamorphism
Copy link
Contributor

Accepted production-ready

@bors bors closed this as completed in a239c0e Oct 28, 2013
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this issue Nov 4, 2021
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#7810 - camsteffen:if-then-panic-pedantic, r=f…
00821ca 
…lip1995

Move if_then_panic to pedantic and rename to manual_assert

Closes rust-lang#7718

changelog: none (lint added since last release)
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
E-easy Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@metajack @catamorphism @emberian @Xazax-hun