Skip to content

Handle indirect spawns (and binding clones) #82

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
graydon opened this issue Jun 28, 2010 · 1 comment
Closed

Handle indirect spawns (and binding clones) #82

graydon opened this issue Jun 28, 2010 · 1 comment

Comments

@graydon
Copy link
Contributor

graydon commented Jun 28, 2010

We currently only know how to spawn a static function. Spawning an indirect (bind) should work, and should clone the binding. Of course this means supporting more lifecycle operations in bindings at all; presently they have neither clone nor drop support.

@graydon
Copy link
Contributor Author

graydon commented Jan 27, 2011

WONTFIX

keeperofdakeys pushed a commit to keeperofdakeys/rust that referenced this issue Dec 12, 2017
dlrobertson pushed a commit to dlrobertson/rust that referenced this issue Nov 29, 2018
dlrobertson pushed a commit to dlrobertson/rust that referenced this issue Nov 29, 2018
…s_chapter

Fix broken links in macros chapter (issue rust-lang#82)
eddyb pushed a commit to eddyb/rust that referenced this issue Jun 30, 2020
antoyo pushed a commit to antoyo/rust that referenced this issue Sep 28, 2021
* Correctly handle st(0) register in the clobbers list
* Gate the clobbers based on enabled target features
bors pushed a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this issue Oct 1, 2021
jaisnan pushed a commit to jaisnan/rust-dev that referenced this issue Oct 31, 2024
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made
under the terms of the Apache 2.0 and MIT licenses.
This issue was closed.
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant