We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
It indents the body deeper than the opening brace, and runs off the right margin. I think something like this would preferable:
callsomethingwithablock({ | x | { // Indent one unit beyond the line that opened the block body_here(); });
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Same for other function expressions, actually. Unfortunately, the current pretty-printer isn't really suited for 'javascript-style' indentation.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Does the "better" notation of foo() { | ... | } prints less horribly?
I haven't tried. But even if it does, blocks-within-parenthesis are a part of the language and should be handled in a moderately elegant way.
Block syntax is different now. It still doesn't pretty-print that nicely, but it is broken in different ways.
Use black_box instead of llvm_asm (rust-lang#944)
ca5aed8
The implementation is the same (where possible), and it unblocks rust-lang#904 Signed-off-by: Joe Richey <joerichey@google.com>
Use cargo locate-project (rust-lang#904)
bac92b7
* use message-format plain, update error handling
No branches or pull requests
It indents the body deeper than the opening brace, and runs off the right margin. I think something like this would preferable:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: