Skip to content

RISC-V ASM test: relax label name constraint. #100052

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 2, 2022
Merged

Conversation

TimNN
Copy link
Contributor

@TimNN TimNN commented Aug 2, 2022

The test is currently broken at LLVM Head, likely since llvm/llvm-project@260a641:

/var/lib/buildkite-agent/builds/rust-llvm-integrate/llvm-project/rust-llvm-integrate-prototype/src/test/assembly/asm/riscv-types.rs:59:11: error: CHECK: expected string not found in input
--
  | // CHECK: lb t0, %pcrel_lo(.Lpcrel_hi0)(t0)
  | ^
  | /var/lib/buildkite-agent/builds/rust-llvm-integrate/llvm-project/rust-llvm-integrate-prototype/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/assembly/asm/riscv-types.riscv64/riscv-types.s:24:36: note: scanning from here
  | auipc t0, %pcrel_hi(extern_static)
  | ^
  | /var/lib/buildkite-agent/builds/rust-llvm-integrate/llvm-project/rust-llvm-integrate-prototype/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/assembly/asm/riscv-types.riscv64/riscv-types.s:25:2: note: possible intended match here
  | lb t0, %pcrel_lo(.Lpcrel_hi18)(t0)
  | ^

As far as I can tell, the exact index in the label probably doesn't matter for the test, especially if LLVM can change it to ~arbitrary values, though I'm not an ASM or RISC-V expert.

This fixes the test.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Aug 2, 2022
@TimNN
Copy link
Contributor Author

TimNN commented Aug 2, 2022

r? @nikic who's working on the LLVM 15 upgrade

@nikic
Copy link
Contributor

nikic commented Aug 2, 2022

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 2, 2022

📌 Commit efa9586 has been approved by nikic

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 2, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2022
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#99987 (Always include a position span in `rustc_parse_format::Argument`)
 - rust-lang#100005 (Remove Clean trait for ast::Attribute and improve Attributes::from_ast)
 - rust-lang#100025 (Remove redundant `TransferWrapper` struct)
 - rust-lang#100045 (Properly reject the `may_unwind` option in `global_asm!`)
 - rust-lang#100052 (RISC-V ASM test: relax label name constraint.)
 - rust-lang#100053 (move [`assertions_on_result_states`] to restriction)
 - rust-lang#100057 (Remove more Clean trait implementations)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 0b3bbe6 into rust-lang:master Aug 2, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.64.0 milestone Aug 2, 2022
@TimNN TimNN deleted the patch-1 branch August 2, 2022 21:15
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants