Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

rustdoc: remove unused mobile CSS .rustdoc { flex-direction } #101534

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 7, 2022

Conversation

notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

According to MDN, flex-direction only applies to flex containers, which are boxes with display: flex or inline-flex.

However, the .rustdoc body container is not a flex-container on mobile. A few lines above, it's set to display: block, so this selector does not have any effect.

According to MDN, [flex-direction] only applies to [flex containers], which
are boxes with `display: flex` or `inline-flex`.

However, the `.rustdoc` body container is not a flex-container on mobile.
A few lines above, it's set to `display: block`, so this selector does
not have any effect.

[flex-direction]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/flex-direction

[flex containers]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/CSS_Flexible_Box_Layout/Basic_Concepts_of_Flexbox#the_flex_container
@rustbot rustbot added the T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Sep 7, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @jsha

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 7, 2022

Some changes occurred in HTML/CSS/JS.

cc @GuillaumeGomez, @Folyd, @jsha

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 7, 2022
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 7, 2022

📌 Commit 210c851 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 7, 2022

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 1000. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 7, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2022
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 14 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#101343 (Add -api-level to pm command)
 - rust-lang#101416 (stdio: Document no support for writing to non-blocking stdio/stderr)
 - rust-lang#101435 (Remove unnecessary `EMIT_MIR_FOR_EACH_BITWIDTH`)
 - rust-lang#101493 (Pass ImplTraitContext as &mut to avoid the need of ImplTraitContext::reborrow)
 - rust-lang#101502 (Do not suggest a semicolon for a macro without `!`)
 - rust-lang#101503 (Add debug calls)
 - rust-lang#101506 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS `#main-content > .since`)
 - rust-lang#101507 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS `#main-content > table td`)
 - rust-lang#101521 (Rustdoc-Json: More accurate struct type.)
 - rust-lang#101525 (Fix typo in pass_manager.rs)
 - rust-lang#101534 (rustdoc: remove unused mobile CSS `.rustdoc { flex-direction }`)
 - rust-lang#101535 (Fix error printing mistake in tidy)
 - rust-lang#101536 (Add documentation for Attr::is_doc_comment)
 - rust-lang#101538 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS `.content .methods > div`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 09e7bb4 into master Sep 7, 2022
@bors bors deleted the notriddle/rustdoc-flex-direction branch September 7, 2022 23:40
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.65.0 milestone Sep 7, 2022
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants