Skip to content

rustdoc: remove unused CSS td.summary-column #102005

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 20, 2022

Conversation

notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

It was added in 2a1bad7 to go with this module summary function:

try!(write!(f, "<td class='summary-column'>"));
try!(write!(f, "<span class='summary Stable' \
style='width: {:.4}%; display: inline-block'>&nbsp</span>",
(100 * cnt.stable) as f64/tot as f64));
try!(write!(f, "<span class='summary Unstable' \
style='width: {:.4}%; display: inline-block'>&nbsp</span>",
(100 * cnt.unstable) as f64/tot as f64));
try!(write!(f, "<span class='summary Deprecated' \
style='width: {:.4}%; display: inline-block'>&nbsp</span>",
(100 * cnt.deprecated) as f64/tot as f64));
try!(write!(f, "<span class='summary Unmarked' \
style='width: {:.4}%; display: inline-block'>&nbsp</span>",
(100 * cnt.unmarked) as f64/tot as f64));
try!(write!(f, "</td></tr>"));

The corresponding HTML was removed in 0a46933.

@rustbot rustbot added the T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Sep 19, 2022
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 19, 2022

Some changes occurred in HTML/CSS/JS.

cc @GuillaumeGomez, @Folyd, @jsha

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @jsha

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 19, 2022
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 19, 2022

📌 Commit 60c98ce has been approved by Dylan-DPC

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 19, 2022
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2022
…umn, r=Dylan-DPC

rustdoc: remove unused CSS `td.summary-column`

It was added in 2a1bad7 to go with this module summary function:

https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/2a1bad70dd9bc99d8db54964108b42da8f4e9fbd/src/librustdoc/html/format.rs#L767-L780

The corresponding HTML was removed in 0a46933.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2022
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#101389 (Tone down explanation on RefCell::get_mut)
 - rust-lang#101798 (Make `from_waker`, `waker` and `from_raw` unstably `const`)
 - rust-lang#101881 (Remove an unused struct field `late_bound`)
 - rust-lang#101904 (Add help for invalid inline argument)
 - rust-lang#101966 (Add unit test for identifier Unicode emoji diagnostics)
 - rust-lang#101979 (Update release notes for 1.64)
 - rust-lang#101985 (interpret: expose generate_stacktrace without full InterpCx)
 - rust-lang#102004 (Try to clarify what's new in 1.64.0 ffi types)
 - rust-lang#102005 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS `td.summary-column`)
 - rust-lang#102017 (Add all submodules to the list of directories tidy skips)
 - rust-lang#102019 (Remove backed off PRs from relnotes)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 548c3ea into rust-lang:master Sep 20, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.66.0 milestone Sep 20, 2022
@notriddle notriddle deleted the notriddle/td-summary-column branch September 20, 2022 05:02
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants