Skip to content

Rollup of 3 pull requests #102362

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

fee1-dead
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

jhpratt and others added 6 commits September 7, 2022 21:59
LLVM 15 added `Optional::has_value`, and LLVM `main` (16) has deprecated
`hasValue`. However, its `explicit operator bool` does the same thing,
and was added long ago, so we can use that across our full LLVM range of
compatibility.
In rust-lang#101230, the internal diagnostic migration lints -
`diagnostic_outside_of_impl` and `untranslatable_diagnostic` - were
modified so that they wouldn't trigger on functions annotated with
`#[rustc_lint_diagnostics]`. However, this change has to make it into
the bootstrap compiler before the `#[allow]` annotations that it aims to
remove can be removed, which is possible now that rust-lang#102051 has landed.

Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
…s, r=joshtriplett

Stabilize `#![feature(mixed_integer_ops)]`

Tracked and FCP completed in rust-lang#87840.

```@rustbot``` label +T-libs-api +S-waiting-on-review +relnotes

r? rust-lang/t-libs-api
Avoid LLVM-deprecated `Optional::hasValue`

LLVM 15 added `Optional::has_value`, and LLVM `main` (16) has deprecated
`hasValue`. However, its `explicit operator bool` does the same thing,
and was added long ago, so we can use that across our full LLVM range of
compatibility.
…mp-allow-lint, r=lcnr

session: remove now-unnecessary lint `#[allow]`s

In rust-lang#101230, the internal diagnostic migration lints - `diagnostic_outside_of_impl` and `untranslatable_diagnostic` - were modified so that they wouldn't trigger on functions annotated with `#[rustc_lint_diagnostics]`. However, this change has to make it into the bootstrap compiler before the `#[allow]` annotations that it aims to remove can be removed, which is possible now that rust-lang#102051 has landed.
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Sep 27, 2022
@fee1-dead
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=3

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 27, 2022

📌 Commit aff319a has been approved by fee1-dead

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Sep 27, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 27, 2022

⌛ Testing commit aff319a with merge 8f07a7cd00743098e191f4a819e820a6384362a9...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 27, 2022

💥 Test timed out

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Sep 27, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@Dylan-DPC Dylan-DPC closed this Sep 28, 2022
@fee1-dead fee1-dead deleted the rollup-abpvqi8 branch September 28, 2022 14:28
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants