Skip to content

Slightly tweak comments wrt lint_overflowing_range_endpoint #102602

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 22, 2022

Conversation

WaffleLapkin
Copy link
Member

From the review: #101986 (comment)

It seemed that the lint was not emitted when the if check failed, but actually this happens already in a special case and the lint is emitted outside of this function, if this function doesn't. I've cleared up the code/comments a bit, so it's more obvious :)

r? @estebank

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Oct 2, 2022
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 2, 2022
@estebank
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 22, 2022

📌 Commit 64e7fd9 has been approved by estebank

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 22, 2022
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2022
Slightly tweak comments wrt `lint_overflowing_range_endpoint`

From the review: rust-lang#101986 (comment)

It _seemed_ that the lint was not emitted when the `if` check failed, but _actually_ this happens already in a special case and the lint is emitted outside of this function, if this function doesn't. I've cleared up the code/comments a bit, so it's more obvious :)

r? `@estebank`
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2022
Slightly tweak comments wrt `lint_overflowing_range_endpoint`

From the review: rust-lang#101986 (comment)

It _seemed_ that the lint was not emitted when the `if` check failed, but _actually_ this happens already in a special case and the lint is emitted outside of this function, if this function doesn't. I've cleared up the code/comments a bit, so it's more obvious :)

r? ``@estebank``
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2022
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#102602 (Slightly tweak comments wrt `lint_overflowing_range_endpoint`)
 - rust-lang#103190 (rustdoc: render bounds of cross-crate GAT params)
 - rust-lang#103224 (Allow semicolon after closure within parentheses in macros)
 - rust-lang#103280 ((rust-lang#102929) Implement `String::leak` (attempt 2))
 - rust-lang#103329 (Add a forgotten check for NonNull::new_unchecked's precondition)
 - rust-lang#103346 (Adjust argument type for mutable with_metadata_of (rust-lang#75091))
 - rust-lang#103360 (Reduce false positives in msys2 detection)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 16c3b64 into rust-lang:master Oct 22, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.66.0 milestone Oct 22, 2022
@WaffleLapkin WaffleLapkin deleted the linty_action branch October 23, 2022 06:17
@WaffleLapkin WaffleLapkin restored the linty_action branch November 16, 2022 09:26
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants