Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Check representability in adt_sized_constraint #102890

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 12, 2022

Conversation

camsteffen
Copy link
Contributor

@camsteffen camsteffen commented Oct 10, 2022

Now that representability is a query, we can use it to preemptively avoid a cycle in adt_sized_constraint.

I moved the representability check into check_mod_type_wf to avoid a scenario where rustc quits before checking all the types for representability. This also removes the check from rustdoc, which is alright AFAIK.

r? @cjgillot

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Oct 10, 2022
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 10, 2022
@camsteffen camsteffen force-pushed the adt-sized-representability branch 2 times, most recently from abb0318 to ddd289e Compare October 10, 2022 18:01
@camsteffen camsteffen force-pushed the adt-sized-representability branch from ddd289e to d933092 Compare October 10, 2022 19:36
@cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 11, 2022

📌 Commit d933092 has been approved by cjgillot

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 11, 2022
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2022
…ity, r=cjgillot

Check representability in adt_sized_constraint

Now that representability is a query, we can use it to preemptively avoid a cycle in `adt_sized_constraint`.

I moved the representability check into `check_mod_type_wf` to avoid a scenario where rustc quits before checking all the types for representability. This also removes the check from rustdoc, which is alright AFAIK.

r? `@cjgillot`
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2022
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#102110 (Migrate rustc_passes diagnostics)
 - rust-lang#102187 (Use correct location for type tests in promoted constants)
 - rust-lang#102239 (Move style guide to rust-lang/rust)
 - rust-lang#102578 (Panic for invalid arguments of `{integer primitive}::ilog{,2,10}` in all modes)
 - rust-lang#102811 (Use memset to initialize readbuf)
 - rust-lang#102890 (Check representability in adt_sized_constraint)
 - rust-lang#102913 (unify `IsPattern` and `IsImport` enum in `show_candidates`)
 - rust-lang#102924 (rustdoc: remove unused classes from sidebar links)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit c8a8e7d into rust-lang:master Oct 12, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.66.0 milestone Oct 12, 2022
@camsteffen camsteffen deleted the adt-sized-representability branch October 12, 2022 12:58
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants