Skip to content

Rollup of 6 pull requests #105008

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Nov 28, 2022
Merged

Rollup of 6 pull requests #105008

merged 22 commits into from
Nov 28, 2022

Conversation

Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

lcnr and others added 22 commits November 25, 2022 15:52
`?0: CoerceUnsized<SomeTy>` can definitely apply because
`?0` matches any type, same for `SomeTy: CoerceUnsized<?0>`
…in favour of `TyCtxt::fn_trait_kind_from_def_id`
This is valid per the comment of the `ClosureKind` defition
Co-authored-by: fee1-dead <ent3rm4n@gmail.com>
Stabilize native library modifier `verbatim`

Stabilization report - rust-lang#104360 (comment).

cc rust-lang#81490
Closes rust-lang#99425
…piler-errors

Refactor `ty::ClosureKind` related stuff

I've tried to fix all duplication and weirdness, but if I missed something do tell :p

r? `@compiler-errors`
Change multiline span ASCII art visual order

Tweak the ASCII art for nested multiline spans so that we minimize line overlaps.

Partially addresses rust-lang#61017.
…-obk

Remove `SelectionContext::infcx()` in favor of field access

Encapsulation doesn't seem particularly important here, and having two choices is always more confusing than having one.

r? types
…gic, r=oli-obk

Simplify some binder shifting logic

Not sure if worth, but we'll see
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Nov 28, 2022
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 28, 2022

📌 Commit d5de2a8 has been approved by Dylan-DPC

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 28, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 28, 2022

⌛ Testing commit d5de2a8 with merge 8a09420...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 28, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Dylan-DPC
Pushing 8a09420 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Nov 28, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 8a09420 into rust-lang:master Nov 28, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.67.0 milestone Nov 28, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Perf Build Sha
#104927 a7639f5b1395e3eabdd4218e6aecc1aba728fc38
#104907 580b2680e1175068ee3d614767dde609a0623b30
#104890 d6c3f38fcf35f7150ce074235fc3f40d3e06a50a
#104795 c1396e78019e2666713385e906569911c98f6401
#104732 f433f4ffca681b5bf89d59f9d12942369b4a0fb6
#104360 0c2b3402f6ad722434c00419805ddfb6216d794d

previous master: 69df0f2c2f

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (8a09420): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDED

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.6% [0.2%, 0.9%] 8
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.9% [-0.9%, -0.8%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.4% [-2.7%, -2.1%] 6
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.3% [-0.9%, 0.9%] 10

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.2% [-2.2%, -2.2%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.3% [-1.3%, -1.3%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) -2.2% [-2.2%, -2.2%] 1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.7% [-3.3%, -2.1%] 6
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression Performance regression. label Nov 29, 2022
@lqd lqd mentioned this pull request Nov 29, 2022
@nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor

These perf changes are all noise.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression-triaged The performance regression has been triaged. label Nov 29, 2022
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. perf-regression Performance regression. perf-regression-triaged The performance regression has been triaged. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants